Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0360220200610070718
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2020 Volume.61 No. 7 p.718 ~ p.725
Clinical Effects of Guardcel¢ç Nasal Packing on Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy
Park Bo-Hyun

Park Jung-Yul
Choi Hee-Young
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical effects of Guardcel¢ç (Genewel. Co, Seongnam, Korea) and Nasopore¢ç (Polyganics, Rozenburglaan, Groningen, The Netherlands), two types of absorbable nasal packing materials after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Methods: A total of 41 patients (49 eyes) who underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy from March 2017 to January 2019 were studied retrospectively. Twenty seven eyes were packed with Guardcel¢ç and twenty two eyes with Nasopore¢ç. We compared the postoperative anatomical and functional surgical success rates between the groups at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 6 months , as well as the frequency of postoperative complications including bleeding.

Results: There was no significant difference between the Guardcel¢ç and Nasopore¢ç groups in the postoperative anatomical and functional surgical success rate at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, or 6 months. Also, there was no significant group difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.

Conclusions: The anatomical and functional surgical success rates and incidence of postoperative complications, including bleeding, synechiae, infection, granuloma, and revision were similar between the Guardcel¢ç and Nasopore¢ç groups. Therefore, Guardcel¢ç can be used safely and effectively as an absorbable nasal packing material in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy treatment.
KEYWORD
Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy, Guardcel¢ç, Nasal packing
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø